The appointment of delegates to these two congresses has generally been carried out by popular assemblies, but in some cases by state assemblies. However, the candidate cannot under any circumstances be regarded as the original custodian of the power with which the delegates acted; Because assemblies were either self-proclaimed “security committees” or hasty popular assemblies, including, but only a small part of the population to be represented, and state assemblies were not allowed to give another body an atom of power granted to them, or to create a new power that the people had to govern without their will. The source of the powers of Congress must be sought only in the tolerance of the people, without which any resolution of Congress, with or without the blessing of the people`s assemblies or state parliaments, would have been a mere brutum; and since Congress undoubtedly exercised national powers that worked throughout the country, the conclusion is inevitable that the will of all the people is the source of the national government in the United States, even since its first imperfect appearance at the Second Continental Congress… How do the differences of opinion between the idea and the war? Over time, the British monarchy came to treat the settlers differently from the other free ones who lived in Britain. Scholarly men among the elites of the colonies, familiar with the works of Locke and other political philosophers, courageously sought a solution. Calls for the monarchy have failed. Parliament and King George III made decisions for the settlers without their consent. The property rights of the settlers (taxes and placements of soldiers without consent) were taken away from them. In the end, these colonial elites discovered that the social contract had been broken, and they were looking for a means of self-administration. Separation was the solution. The power of kings and judges is nothing more than to transfer what is only derived from them and, in the confidence of the people to the common good, is entrusted to them all, in which power is still fundamental and cannot be taken away from them without violating their natural right of birth. 510 A key question is whether unanimous approval of the governed is necessary.
If this were the case, it would imply the right to secession for those who do not want to be governed by a certain collective. All democratic governments now allow decisions to be made on the dissent of a minority of voters, which, in the opinion of some theorists, calls into question the ability of these governments, in all circumstances, to claim to act with the assent of the governed.  How did the delegates of the Constitutional Convention resolve their differences on slavery? Locke was not the first to propose such rights.